🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.